Lawyers: JOIN NOW

Liability Provision Ensures Victims Compensated by At-Fault Parties

The Advocate Files: Liability Provision Ensures Victims Compensated by At-Fault Parties

 

Liability Provision Ensures Victims Compensated by At-Fault Parties

With comment from Ottawa Accident Lawyer – David Hollingsworth

In cases where joint and several liability apply, a person injured by multiple parties may be awarded compensation from one, several or all responsible — which can be crucial in motor vehicle accident proceedings, where defendants often have inadequate insurance, says Ottawa personal injury lawyer David Hollingsworth.

In Gardiner v. MacDonald Estate [2016] ONSC 602 , the defendant vehicle entered an intersection on a red light where it was struck by an OC Transpo bus owned and operated by the City of Ottawa and its employee.

A number of occupants in the defendant vehicle suffered fatal or catastrophic injuries, and the occupants and/or their estates began proceedings against the owner and operator of the defendant vehicle and the owner and operator of the City of Ottawa bus, among others.

In this case, the joint and several liability provision of the Negligence Act was applied to allow certain plaintiffs to obtain compensation from the at-fault driver’s insurer and the municipality, writes Hollingsworth.

“By virtue of the joint and several liability provisions of the Negligence Act, liability is established where the court makes a finding that a party is at least 1 per cent at fault. For the sake of argument, if the court in Gardiner were to make a finding that the City of Ottawa is not liable, there would be a significant shortfall in the insurance proceeds available to the plaintiffs, despite the fact that there were several respective under-insured motorist insurance defendants,” he explains.

Alternatively, Hollingsworth says in the article, if the court were to find the City of Ottawa and the bus operator at least 1 per cent at fault for the accident, the city and the bus operator would be responsible to pay the difference between the agreed upon damages and the $200,000 policy.

In this case, the court held that the bus operator, and therefore the City of Ottawa vicariously, were 20 per cent at fault for the accident and could in fact be responsible for 95 per cent of the plaintiffs’ damages. The City of Ottawa is appealing the decision.

The Negligence Act, and the principle of joint and several liability, recognizes that any defendant who is at fault in any way, is liable to indemnify an injured victim, writes Hollingsworth.

“In Gardiner, joint and several liability ensures that the victims and their families are fairly compensated by the negligent parties notwithstanding the apportionment of liability,” he says.

However, the doctrine of joint and several liability also arose recently in Tuffnail v. Meekes [2016] ONSC 710 with a different result.

In this case, the plaintiffs were involved in a single vehicle accident, and the defendant had a policy with $2 million limit. However the combined total of the plaintiffs’ claims amounted to approximately $8 million, resulting in a significant shortfall of insurance proceeds.

“In Tuffnail, it was alleged that the operator of the defendant vehicle consumed alcohol at a wedding reception. The wedding reception took place at a community centre that was rented by an individual and owned by the Township of Perth. Accordingly, the plaintiffs commenced proceedings against these parties and others. The plaintiffs in Tuffnail alleged that the operator of the defendant vehicle was over-served alcohol and argued that the over-service was a contributing factor in the accident,” writes Hollingsworth.

While a successful claim against the township may have made up the shortfall for the plaintiffs, the court dismissed the claim on the basis of the Supreme Court of Canada case Hryniak v. Mauldin [2014] SCC 7, which held that “summary judgment rules must be interpreted broadly, favouring proportionality and fair access to the affordable, timely and just adjudication of claims.”

For those concerned that joint and several liability prejudices deep pocket defendants, writes Hollingsworth, “the Tuffnail case demonstrates that the court does not readily attach liability to these parties. As a result, the victims and their families were inadequately insured.”

 

Does this article speak to you? Was it helpful?

The points discussed above are from an Ottawa OC Transpo bus accident lawyer that focuses his practice on personal injury and disability law – Including serious injury and death arising from motor vehicle accidents in Ottawa and surrounding areas. If a loved one has had a serious injury from any type of car accident in Ottawa and surrounding regions contact David Hollingsworth for a free, no obligation consultation.

View the profile of this Ottawa car accident lawyer

 

This and other articles / posts originally appeared on the now defunct advocatedaily.com. As expressed in writing by that website’s owner, the articles / posts, part of a paid service provided by Advocate Daily, are the intellectual property of the lawyer and/or legal service provider who wrote, or for whom the article / post was written and they are free to use as they wish. All articles / posts redeployed on Top Lawyers are done with the expressed consent of the professionals mentioned in said article / post.

Sponsored Ads: Firms to Keep Top of Mind

Lawyers: Join Today!

  • Increase your online visibility.
  • Drive traffic to your existing website.
  • Grow your legal practice.
  • Don't see your city and/or practice area?
    Just let us know - We can add it!
  • Click here for details.

Call: (Local) 416-988-4LAW (4529)
Call: (Toll Free) 1-888-645-5228
E-mail: info@toplawyerscanada.ca

Experienced Lawyers To Help With Your Legal Needs

One of the things that differentiates Top Lawyers from other directories is our exclusivity. As our name suggests, we only list experienced lawyers that meet strict, minimum practice, experience and/or recognition requirements.

These requirements include:
(One or more of the following)

  • Awarded the recognition of “Queen’s Counsel” (Q.C. Designation)
  • Recognized by their Bar Association or Law Society as a “Certified Specialist”
  • Partner in a law firm and in good standing with the legal governing body of their province
  • Have practiced in their preferred area of law for a minimum of ten years

What does this mean to you, the general public?

You can have confidence in selecting and retaining the experienced lawyers listed here. They have "Been there. Done that" and bring their considerable knowledge and skill to support every case they undertake. After all...

"When you really need a lawyer - You want a Top Lawyer.™"

Connect with us on Google+