Attaching Liability to Road Authorities Challenging for Plaintiffs
The Advocate Files: Personal Injury Law | Attaching Liability to Road Authorities
Attaching Liability to Road Authorities Challenging for MVA Plaintiffs
With comment from Ottawa Accident Lawyer – David Hollingsworth
Although in cases where joint and several liability apply, a person who is injured by multiple parties may be awarded compensation from one, several or all responsible, recent cases show that the court does not readily attach liability to defendants with ‘deep pockets,’ Ottawa personal injury lawyer David Hollingsworth writes.
As Hollingsworth, principal of Ottawa Personal Injury Lawyers, explains, the principle of joint and several liability was applied recently in Gardiner v. MacDonald Estate 2016 ONSC 602, Tuffnail v. Meekes 2016 ONSC 710, and more recently, in Beckford v. Bathia 2016 ONSC 5115.
The Beckford case, he says, “further demonstrates that any perceived injustices arising from the doctrine of joint and several liability are grossly overstated and in fact it is now harder than ever to attach liability to road authorities and others (roadway engineers, highway construction firms, vehicle manufacturers etc.) in the context of motor vehicle accident claims.”
In Beckford, writes Hollingsworth, the plaintiff sued the defendant for damages arising from a 2012 motor vehicle accident that occurred near the Yonge St. exit on Highway 401. The plaintiff alleged that her vehicle was completely stopped and while she was stopped her vehicle was struck from behind by the defendant’s motor vehicle.
However, Hollingsworth says: “The defendant commenced a third-party claim against the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) for failing to ensure that the highway was reasonably safe for motorists. Specifically, the defendant alleged that dust and debris were present in the laneway he was driving on the date of the accident, and the presence of that dust and debris caused and/or contributed to the accident.”
The MTO defended the third-party claim and issued a fourth-party claim against Brennan Paving & Construction Ltd. (Brennan) for contribution and indemnity, as the MTO had allegedly hired Brennan to perform maintenance and repair work to the highway.
The MTO and Brennan brought joint motions for summary judgment, submitting that there was no evidence to support the allegations of negligence in the third-party claim, and therefore the fourth-party claim.
Although Hollingsworth says the defendant resisted the motion on the basis that the MTO and Brennan produced evidence that was incomplete and did not reflect the “true and accurate condition of the lane at the time of the accident,” he says the MTO produced affidavit evidence from a maintenance superintendent, while Brennan produced affidavits from the co-project managers.
The court also reviewed the motor vehicle accident report, noting that dust and debris were never mentioned by the parties involved in the accident in the investigating officer’s notes. The court ultimately relied on Hryniak v. Mauldin 2014 SCC 7 and granted the summary judgment.
“Beckford and Tuffnail both demonstrate that the court will not easily attach liability to second or third defendants which may include road authorities, municipalities, or construction firms, among others. If anything, the Beckford case once again tips the scale in favour of deep pocket defendants. The case may potentially be used against plaintiffs who may wish to add, for example, a road authority as a defendant in an action. After reviewing Beckford, it is unclear what evidence is required to keep a road authority in an action,” writes Hollingsworth.
Ultimately, he adds, both Beckford and Tuffnail “appear to place an onerous burden on parties advancing claims against road authorities or companies that may be responsible for a highway’s state of disrepair.”
Does this article speak to you? Was it helpful?
The points discussed above are from an Ottawa personal injury lawyer that focuses his practice on personal injury and disability law – Including serious injury and death arising from motor vehicle accidents in Ottawa and surrounding areas. If a loved one has had a serious injury from any type of car accident in Ottawa and surrounding regions contact David Hollingsworth for a free, no obligation consultation.
View the profile of this Ottawa car accident lawyer